Access provisioning & password resets
Resolves routine identity and access requests directly against your documented policy, without a technician touching every ticket.
Resolve tickets, do not just route them .
We build agents that read incidents and service requests against your knowledge base and systems, resolving what they can and routing the rest with context attached.
Three-agent product advisor guiding customers through print-order configuration.
Read case studySupply chain intelligence agents reducing manual coordination overhead.
Production AI workloads moved to new hardware for on-prem LLM deployment.
AI agent implementation for a global automotive enterprise.
Text-to-workflow agents building validated node graphs inside the platform.
Read case studyHIPAA-compliant agentic RAG over proprietary clinical triage guidelines.
Read case studyWorkflow rules match a ticket to a queue based on a fixed pattern. An agent reads the actual incident, cross-references your knowledge base and system state, and either resolves the standard case directly or routes the exception with the reasoning attached — handling the variation a rule set cannot.
Ticket categories with a documented resolution path.
Resolves routine identity and access requests directly against your documented policy, without a technician touching every ticket.
Reads incoming incidents against your knowledge base, resolving documented cases and routing the rest with a summary attached.
Cross-checks change requests against policy and prior incidents, drafting a review summary instead of a manual read-through.
Answers employee questions from your actual runbooks and documentation — sourced, not generic advice.
None of these numbers come from an ITSM deployment — we have not shipped one yet, and we are not going to dress up a proxy as one. They come from Mixam (print on demand), Synera (engineering software) and Schmitt-Thompson (healthcare). They are here because each measures a mechanic a service desk runs on: evaluating and routing work in real time across many tools, executing a multi-step procedure on top of systems that already exist, and stopping rather than guessing when the source material runs out. Every figure links to the case study behind it.
Agents do not close a major incident, approve a change, or grant standing access on their own. They read the ticket, pull system state and runbook coverage, draft the resolution or the routing decision — and log every step for the technician who signs off.
Engineers on Synera's platform assembled each complex workflow by hand, node by node.
Not an ITSM deployment — A three-agent product advisor guiding customers through print-order configuration — 15 tools working against more than a billion product combinations.
Nurse-triage guidance where a wrong recommendation is a patient-safety event — staged retrieval and validation rather than one model answering in a single pass.
We have not yet shipped a production agent inside an ITSM organization. These are the closest structural references we have — a multi-agent system evaluating and routing work across 15 tools, multi-step automation running on top of existing systems, and an agent that escalates instead of answering when confidence drops.
TriStorm keeps resolution accuracy and engineering aligned.
We audit ticket volume, resolution patterns, and knowledge-base coverage — ranking automation candidates by volume and documentation quality.
We implement against real ticket data, with an evaluation suite scored for resolution accuracy before production.
Production rollout with monitoring and audit logging, plus a structured handoff so your IT team runs the system independently.
Talk directly to our founders and PhD AI engineers. We will show you real results from 30+ agentic projects and walk through how to apply them to your own ticket-triage and change-management workflows. Every example is something already running in production.
Your team owns what we build. We work on open-source foundations, and the agent logic, the integrations and the evaluation harness transfer to you at the end of the engagement.
A 30-minute call identifies ticket volume, knowledge-base coverage, and a realistic path to a working agent.